With more than 30 years of experience, our accomplished attorneys are here to guide you through these difficult times and get the compensation you deserve.


Work Comp – TC v WalGreen (2021)
Our client suffered a low back injury which required multiple surgeries. Her prior lawyer stated that the most the insurance carrier would offer as $150,000 and there was nothing more he could do. We took over the case and deposed the PQME and hired a vocational expert to comment on wage loss. We deposed the vocational expert who admitted on cross-examination that our position was correct. Based on the collapse of the defense case the case settled for $1,000,000 shortly after we requested a trial date.


Work Comp – JC v. OM Contracting (2021)
Our client desperately needed back surgery which his prior attorney, who was letting his paralegal run the case, did not obtain. Our client’s prior attorney advised that surgery would never be approved based on a utilization review denial and that the client should settle for $75,000. We took over the case and went to trial and showed that the utilization review denial was defective in many respects. The court agreed the spine surgery was ordered. After the surgery the issue for the value of the case became the ability to compete in the open labor market. The defense expert opined in his written report that our client could compete, but when we took his deposition and cross-examined him under oath he admitted that he had not reviewed the key deposition of the pain management doctor. He admitted that if he took that deposition into consideration our position was correct. The insurance carrier was still recalcitrant about paying anymore than $250,000, but two weeks before trial agreed to pay $775,000 to settle the matter in full.


Work Comp – KA v. CSI (2018)
On the eve of trial the matter settled for $280,000.00.


Work Comp – JC v. CR, Inc. (2018)
The matter settled just before trial for $475,000.00.


Work Comp – JA v. Kroger Food 4 Less (2017)
On the day of trial Kroger Food 4 Less agreed to pay the full value of the case, about $2,500,000.00.


Work Comp – ML v. School District (2016)
Ultimately, our client was awarded full retirement, full medical care for her and her family and $450,000.00 to settle the workers’ compensation case.

These Are Just Some Of Our Recent Results For Our Clients

Our client was represented by a lawyer out of LA she hired through a TC ad. She thought the good lawyers are in LA, which is completely wrong. That LA lawyer told her he would never get more than $30,000.00 to settle her case and he could not get her shoulder surgery nor neck treatment because they had been denied. This LA lawyer ignored the clear pathway the PQME left open to get to those treatments. We rebuilt the case for our client including getting to the PQME the record he needed to recommend surgery. This included reviews by excellent shoulder and spine surgeons, which the LA lawyer did not do. The PQME did ultimately make the recommendations we thought proper and shortly before a trial on provision of surgery the case settled for $230,000.00.

Our client’s prior attorney recommended settlement in the $30,000.00 to 50,000.00 range. Our client was confused because his injury featured multiple body parts and thought his case might be worth more. He was correct. We successfully obtained evaluation, treatment and surgery for the other body parts and ultimately settled the case just before trial for $220,000.00.
Our client, while working, was hit by a car and that driver had only a $15,000.00 policy. Instead for settling his workers compensation case we pushed it to a findings and award so that his underinsured motorist carrier could not claim credit. It is quite common to see workers compensation attorneys not realize that in an underinsured case, the underinsured carrier cannot claim credit effectively. We began the underinsured motorist case and the carrier claimed full credit and demand that we settle the workers compensation case first so it could take full credit. It offered only $50,000.00. We recommended our client refuse and pushed the matter through hearings and to arbitration. Ultimately, the underinsured carrier paid the full $250,000.00 policy limit.
Our client injured his back and required surgery as a result of picking up bags of flour. The carrier was unreasonably aggressive and tried to ambush our client by providing to the Agreed Medical Examiner facts and documents without our required approval. Prior to this improper contact the AME found the injury totally caused by the defendant employer. After the incorrect facts and out of context documents supplied by defense counsel he found that each employer had half of the liability. We pressed the matter to trial on the improper contact and the Board ruled that the contact was indeed improper and that the reports after the improper contact were inadmissible. That left the original AME finding as the medical evidence. The carrier fired its defense attorney and hired a new one. The new attorney sought a rebuttal vocational expert, but he too found a 100% case as had our expert based on this record. Our client’s prior attorney told him he should accept $15,000.00 because nothing more to do on the case because surgery was denied. We settled the case on the date of trial for $650,000.00.
Our client was thrown from an elevated forklift while pruning date trees. We discovered through inspection of the equipment that the owner had improperly fabricated the platform harness anchor points and let and unqualified farm manager drive the forklift onto uneven ground which caused the forklift to tilt and throw our client. He suffered a severely fractured ankle which was fused and required several staged surgeries over three years. The carrier wanted to cut off temporary disability after two years of benefits. To combat this termination of benefits we took the surgeon’s deposition and he agreed that during the course of surgery cut the lower leg bones and grafted them which resulted in a slight leg shortening. Our argument was that this was an amputation which entitled our client to up to five years of temporary disability. Despite an initial offer of $100,000.00 we settled the matter for $600,000.00.

Our client was physically threatened by a tenant by phone, text and in person resulting in post-traumatic stress disorder. The insurance carrier downplayed the injury and PTSD claimed that the panel qualified medical examiner’s reports were not persuasive. Our client’s prior lawyer agreed with the insurance carrier was ready to settle the case for less than $100,000.00. We advised KA that the offer was too low and that we recommended taking the deposition of the panel qualified medical examiner to defeat the defense arguments. KA followed our advice and we took over the case. Within a matter of months we effectively deposed the panel qualified medical examiner to bolster his opinions and pressed the case to trial. On the eve of trial the matter settled for $280,000.00.

Our client suffered a significant shoulder injury and underwent several surgeries by doctors selected by the insurance carriers and the surgeries were not very successful in restoring function. The insurance company offered to settle our client’s case for $75,000.00. We recommended that our client reject that he allows us to develop the evidence. He agreed and we developed both the medical evidence and the vocational rehabilitation evidence including the depositions of the treating doctors and the defense rehabilitation expert. That expert wrote in his report that our client was fully employable, but on cross-examination admitted that he had purposely omitted evidence of our client’s pain in his analysis and that if he included that evidence then our client was indeed likely not employable. The matter settled just before trial for $475,000.00.

People ex rel Alzayat v. Hebb, Sunline Transit Agency: In a case of first impression before the Court of Appeals we persuaded the Court that the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act liability extends to employers including public self-insured agencies and that the general litigation privilege does not immunize the fraud. We alleged that Hebb falsely denied that Alzayat has suffered and injury and made those false denial both in a written report and in a deposition. A courageous co-employee came forward and confirmed the injury event and workers’ compensation did pick up and pay the claim. Sunline claimed that government self-insured agencies could not be sued for workers’ compensation fraud and that any statements made, no matter how false, were privileged under the general litigation privilege and also subject to the exclusive remedy bar. The Court of Appeal rejected all of these contentions and ordered the opinion published. This case shows that bad actor employers can be held to account for falsely denying injury, falsely reporting wages, etc.

While lifting a box our client felt a sharp pain in his neck. The MRI revealed cord compression and our client should have been afforded immediate decompression surgery. Unfortunately Food 4 Less (Kroger) and its administrator Sedgwick insisted on returning our client to work. In fact, we uncovered an email that should the nurse case manager stating that although the doctor would likely not return him to work given the severity of symptoms the doctor should be persuaded to return him to work anyway. Our client’s prior lawyer selected this doctor and this doctor did return our client to work. Our client was frustrated and came to us and we immediately stepped in and secured surgery. The defense initially suggested a settlement of about $250,000.00 and we recommended rejection. It also claimed that the neck injury was really due to a prior dirt bike accident several years earlier, that there was a genetic defect component, or that this was not one injury but several which would have the effect of reducing the ultimate award. The Panel QME was deposed four times, the operating surgeon twice. We set the matter for trial as defense counsel would not respond to our requests to try and resolve the matter. On the day of trial Kroger Food 4 Less agreed to pay the full value of the case, about $2,500,000.00.

Our client, a journeyman plumber, suffered a cumulative injury over the years to his neck culminating in fusion surgery. His prior lawyer recommended a settlement of $165,000.00, which we recommended he reject because the evidence showed that additional surgery was need to fix a broken plate and we believed the offer to be too low. We secured that surgery which repaired the problem and settled the case for $465,000.00.

Our client underwent lumbar surgery and the result was not optimal. The defense insisted that the case rated out to no more than 28% disability and on that basis offered only $125,000.00 to settle the matter. We deposed the numerous doctors involved and secured a vocational rehabilitation expert report showing that our client’s pain profile due to the poor surgery prevented him from holding regular work. We settled the case for $525,000.00 shortly before trial.

Our client teacher tried to break up a fight and was punched and then her head hit the ground causing a fracture. School District consistently obstructed medical care including plastic surgery to repair the fracture near the eye and the nose. Our client’s rprio counsel did not secure that additional surgeries and treatment, but we did. The district offered $85,000.00 plus a resignation from the teaching position which our client rejected on our advice. Ultimately, our client was awarded full retirement, full medical care for her and her family and $450,000.00 to settle the workers’ compensation case.

The injured worker suffered third degree burns on his toros and legs and underwent lumbar surgery. He was injured when he was testing an underground pool heater which had been placed in an unventilated subterranean vault. Because of a lack of venting the gas accumulated and exploded during testing. The insurance carrier made a take it or leave it offer of $350,000.00, then $500,000.00 during trial. The jury returned a verdict of $6,750,000.00. Because of employer negligence the workers compensation lien has been wiped out and the workers compensation will also be obligated to contribute further.

The injured workers suffered cranial factures and partial blindness in one eye when the wheel from a hose cart separated when its tire was being inflated. The wheel was improperly designed and built by a Chinese manufacturer and it was then sold by a national hardware chain. One defendant settled for its insurance policy of $2,000,000.00. The other defendant offered $400,000.00 and the matter was prepared for trial. On the day of trial the second defendant also agreed to pay $2,000,000.00. The workers compensation carrier then waived all credit as the employer was also negligent and paid an additional $250,000.00, bringing the total gross recovery to $4,250,000.00.

Mr. C suffered a partial finger amputation that resulted in reflex sympathetic dystrophy or complex regional pain syndrome in the arm. Mr. C’s prior workers’ compensation lawyer recommended a settlement of $150,000. Mr. C thought this was inadequate and retained us. We settled the matter for $790,000.
In this rear end automobile accident the insurance adjuster offered $35,000 and then at mediation offered $325,000. The week before a jury trial was to commence the matter was settled for $550,000.
Our client was kicked by a cow he was milking causing an arm injury. The employer denied that our client was disabled to any serious degree. After taking the deposition of the doctors involved and setting the matter for trial the insurer agreed to pay our client $500,000.

Mr. L’s prior counsel recommended a settlement of $100,000.00 after having the case for four years. Immediately upon being retained we secured an additional $14,000.00 of past temporary disability which prior counsel overlooked and then settled the matter for $460,000 within eighteen months.

Mr. G, a motorcyclist, contended he was cut off by JP and could not avoid rear-ending her car. Mr. G required shoulder arthroscopic surgery was a result. The insurer for JP denied liability contending Mr. G was speeding recklessly and that he caused the rear-end collision. The insurer was confident of its position because their expert was a former California Highway Patrol motorcycle officer and accident investigator. An offer of $20,000 was rejected on our advice. We obtained an award of $265,000.

Mr. R suffered and ankle injury when hit by a forklift. Defense offers began at $40,000 and rose to $75,000. Mr. R accepted our advice to reject these offers. The matter was set for trial and just before trial the case was settled for $265,000.

While driving the employer’s car Mrs. R was struck by a drunk driver and required arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The drunk driver’s insurance paid $15,000. PIC contending that the injury was not covered. The matter was settled for $250,000.

Our client suffered a low back injury and the defense offer was $35,000 and then at the deposition of a doctor the defense attorney stated that the new offer of $45,000 was final and not one penny more would be paid. The matter was settled at trial for $77,500.

The employer denied that the employee had ever been hurt at work and refused to provide benefits. We established that injury did occur and the matter was resolved for $70,000.

Mr. R contended that even though he was called a manger and not paid overtime he was in reality a cook entitled to overtime. Employer contended that Mr. R was owed nothing because even though he may have been entitled to overtime he was paid on an agreed basis that included overtime. The matter was settled for $50,000.

Mr. C contended that he and his co-workers were owed overtime and meal pay. Employer contended that nothing was owed because the workers were managers and further that they had not worked overtime. The matter was resolved with Ms. C receiving $50,000 for his whistleblower fee and past wages and all his co-workers were also paid their past wages. The employer also paid our attorney fees.

Defendant denied that Mr. A was hurt as his job as his supervisor testified that no injury had occurred and that any back injuries were due to a prior automobile accident. We found co-workers that testified that the supervisor was untruthful in his reports. The matter was resolved in Mr. A’s favor for $40,000.

Plaintiff contended she was not paid for meal periods or overtime. Ultimately, Plaintiff was paid her past due wages with interest, a whistleblower fee for securing fines due the State of California, her co-workers were also paid their past due wages and the employer paid our attorney fees.

Defendant employer and its president owner denied ever having employer our client, Mr. S. They also denied, under oath, doing any construction business in the Palm Springs area. Through our investigation we located documents showing that the employer was being untruthful including construction invoices, cancelled checks, contracts, photos and other witnesses. The employer’s insurance carrier accepted and settled the claim and we turned over our investigatory materials to the District Attorney. The employer was charged with multiple felonies based on our investigation.

The above cases are examples only and you should not make any inference about the outcome of your case and each case is unique and dependent on its own facts.

Stalled Serious Injury Cases

Stalled Serious
Injury Cases

We specialize in reviving and closing stalled workers’ comp cases on your behalf.

Footer Briefcase Icon


We work hard to get you the proper medical care and full benefits you deserve.

Clock Icon

Wage & Hour

We stand strong and fight to maximize compensation for wage and hour violations.

Footer Document Icon

Injury Cases

Experts at helping clients navigate through the most complex injury cases.

Your injury
is personal to us

Did you get hurt at work?
Were you denied the extra time you earned?
We can help.

Contact Us

Get A Free Consultation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.